Do you support qualified immunity for police officers?

I agree with only for officers that have clean record and no complaints but also give more training and education to police officers.

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

No, only if the crime is a misdemeanor

depends on what they did

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Police make decisions in split seconds. While trying to save a life they must also save themselves. They need more training and at higher levels much like our military. Except in extreme situations where an officer is abusive to power, they should not be responsible for a split second decision. Just as doctors are not responsible for common mistakes in malpractice.

Yes, but monitor the behavior of the cops, if excessive violence is used against a criminal who has surrendered

No, but still hold superiors accountable for the misconduct of those under their authority.

No, nor for any other officials. Excepting the sheriff's department, all police departments should be abolished and replaced by civil militias.

Only in minimal misconduct circumstances, not in cases that effect a person's health

Yes, but it needs to be very limited to prevent abuse

Yes and provide more training and education for police officers and but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record. Also, increase training and education for police officers, so they know which conduct is illegal.

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints. Also, provide more training and education for police officers, so they know which conduct is illegal.

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record. Also, provide more training and education for police officers, so they know which conduct is illegal.

No, and severely increase personal liability for gross misconduct. Police should be held at much higher standards than the general public.

Yes, with an emphasis on qualified. Qualified immunity should not be blanket immunity to personal liability.

If someone in a position of trust makes a mistake, should their intention or the outcome of their actions weigh more heavily in deciding their consequences?

No, piloce officers should be held accountable just as every other citizen

No

yes, but increase personal liability for misconduct

Can you think of a time when not knowing the rules led to unexpected outcomes, and should ignorance excuse the behavior?

How would you feel if someone wasn't held accountable for their actions because they didn't know they were wrong?

If a friend made a serious mistake out of ignorance, do you think they should face consequences?

Yes

Imagine you were harmed by someone who claimed they didn't know it would hurt you; how would that make you feel about fairness and justice?

In a situation where rules are unclear, should people be given the benefit of the doubt, or should they be encouraged to seek clarity before acting?

Should there be a universal standard for accountability, or is it fair for different roles in society to have different levels of responsibility?

How does the idea that some people might not be held accountable for their actions because of their job impact your sense of security?

Do you believe that being unaware of the harm your actions could cause is a valid defense, or should people be more proactive in understanding the impact of their actions?

Reflecting on the balance between job effectiveness and ethical behavior, where should the line be drawn when mistakes happen?

Yes, as long as the practice is not abused and that officers who abuse their powers are held accountable for their actions

No, no one should have immunity

No, but provide more training and education for police officers, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct & provide more training and education for police officers

No, provide more training, education, and personal liability for misconduct. Prevent the issue before it happens, not the other way around

Yes, as long as they are not abusing the power.

Strong protections of officers do need to be in place but ongoing training, frequent performance/conduct/psychological reviews should also be utilized as proactive measures.

Yes, but make the departments liable

Yes, but I would prefer abolishing police

Yes, but qualified immunity is abused.

No , and provide more training and education for police officers

Yes, as long as all officers receive mandatory therapy and regular psych evaluations.

No, police officers who engage in misconduct should not receive immunity for thier actions; otherwise, police officers who are properly performing their duties should definitely receive qualified immunity.

No - Police officers should be held to the same standard as typical citizens. They should receive more training to conduct themselves appropriately.

Yes, only for actions that are not lethal or violent acts AND only involving officers with no prior history of complaints and offenses. In addition, provide more training and education AND increase personal liability for misconduct.

Officers should be held to a higher standard than the people on to enforce the law safely.

Yes, but only with clear definition and agreement of what "clearly defined law" means.

Yes - but only with clear definition and agreement of what "clearly defined law" means.

Depends on how big or small the misconduct is

abolish the police

No, but teach them how to handle situations that would lead to illegal conduct.

No; if an officer engages in illegal misconduct regarding their work, then this shows a failure to do their job efficiently. They should be held accountable then educated on the issue.

Yes, but limit its scope

Yes but only if the officer can prove ignorance instead of simply playing dumb.

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints, and provide more training and education for police officers.

No, but I don't want crime rates to go up.

it depends on what the officer did

cops can easily pull the "i didnt know it was a brush" card and get away with it easy. unless that person has a weapon or something illegal on they should get in trouble for assuming and not being patient or more aware.

Only in cases of minor misconduct not for serious cases such as murder or wrongful death, corruption, etc.

should not be immune. We need to provide better training and education to ensure that they won't do things that could cause them to get sued for misconduct