Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

No, only over suspected terrorist and not the whole country.

Yes, they should be used for intelligence purposes, but only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

This is situational.

Yes, if it is authorized with reliable intelligence information and with factual proof that the potential target is a known terrorist (but they should be captured instead of killing them), and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist then the military should be able to take action upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Yes, but only to kill.

Only over individuals tied to terrorism.

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, and granted with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, and if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Only if they have attacked us first.

Yes. However, we should put restrictions into place. The word "suspected" as it is needs to be reviewed. Killing suspected terrorists would not be a good idea - instead, we should capture them and give them a fair trial. And even if they are convicted - the death penalty is also a very controversial punishment.

Only if done quickly without civilian deaths.

Yes, but only over people who have ties to terror cells.

Only over terrorists or terror suspects.

Only for known terrorists.

Only on certain people not whole countries.

No, only to gather intelligence if there is a reasonable suspicion.

Yes, only to kill.

Only over certain individuals not the whole country

Just over individuals not whole countries.

Only over individuals and not the whole country.

Only to locate known terrorists/terror cells and destroy them.

Only if no civilian will die, just the terrorist.

Yes, but only if the evidence is clear.

Send drones which will kill said terrorists.

Only individuals not the whole country.

Yes, they should be used to gather intelligence and kill terrorists, but only if there is enough evidence and the guarantee that more lives will be saved than lost. The military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing.

If Congress has declared war, then yes. If Congress has not declared war, then for the collection of intelligence only.

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes, and only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes. It should be used only if there is enough evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, then the military should be able act upon this to eliminate threats to our country's wellbeing, with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

No, the war in the Middle East only contributes to muslim immigration in Europe.

Yes however, it depends on the justification of terrorism or political and geopolitical interest.

Yes, but only if it is used for intelligence purposes, with proper oversight and precautions in place to minimize targeting of civilians, and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question.

Yes, if authorized with reliable intelligence information and sufficient evidence that the potential target is a known terrorist, and with full cooperation and permission from the country in question, if both Congress and the President agree to it.

Yes, only if they country has been alerted before hand and agrees, or the military may if the country in question may have ties to the terrorist without alerting the country.

fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence only

If it’s essential to seek out information from drones with the suspicion and factual evidence of a U.S Civil threat than I believe it should be deemed necessary to do s. Killing terrorists with drones on the other hand can be deemed necessary only if you see them physically planning an attack or attempting to attack in the process.

Yes, military strategies must advance with the times.

Yes, but only if the military has reasonable evidence

Yes, but only with reasonable evidence

Yes, but ensure that no civilian deaths will result from drone strikes.

Yes, but only if there is undeniable proof that the suspected terrorists are planning to attack our country.

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country.

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, and not to kill suspected terrorists, unless the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war, then 100% NO

Yes, but only after an extensive briefing and oversight to determine if the target is a terrorist or not.

Yes but only with permission unless congress declares war

Yes, but only if due process is followed beforehand.

Yes, but only if the suspected terrorist have undeniable evidence of their planned crimes.

Yes, if it is a known terrorist

Yes, but only if they have credible reason to believe so

No, not without approval from the foreign countries in-question

Lets be friends with everyone possible

Lets leave every country alone, and be friends with everyone

Lets be friends with every country

Lets create peace and be friends with every country in the world.

No, only to gather intelligence and to defend civilians.

Yes, but their usage should be limited to gathering intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but get permission and don't just kill them

Yes, and strongly invest in UAS

Yes, as long as the country in question takes responsibility for allowing strikes that cause collateral damage

Yes, as long as the country in question takes responsibility for any collateral damage

only if the country the terrorists reside in ask for it

No, only to gather intelligence with the permission from the county in question

Yes, to gather intelligence and kill confirmed (not merely suspected) terrorists

Yes, to gather intelligence when terrorist activities are suspected and to strike suspected enemy targets when the country in question is under a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, to gather intelligence and kill confirmed (not just suspected) terrorists

No, drones should only be utilized to gather intelligence. They should not to be used to kill confirmed (not just suspected) terrorists without a Congressional declaration of war or unless an imminent attack requires an emergency response from the President

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining intelligence until or unless their is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only to gather intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war, in which case the assassination of suspected terrorists and airstrikes against enemy targets would be warranted.

Yes, but only to gather intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war which would warrant the assassination of suspected terrorists and airstrikes against enemy targets.

Yes, but only to gather intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining intelligence until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only for intelligence gathering purposes until there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gathering intelligence until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but permission from the country in question should be granted first until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining intelligence until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war.

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining intelligence until there is a Congressional declaration of war.

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining intelligence until there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only for intelligence gathering unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, only to gather intelligence until or unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but their use should be restricted to gaining Intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only for gathering intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, either with permission of the country in question or under a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question during peacetime or under a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only for gathering intelligence until there is a Congressional declaration of war

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists without a Congressional declaration of war present

Yes, but only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists unless an imminent attack has been confirmed or under a Congressional declaration of war

No, drones should only be utilized to gather intelligence. They should not to be used to kill confirmed (not just suspected) terrorists under a Congressional declaration of war or if an imminent attack requires an emergency response from the President

No, only to gather intelligence. They should not to be used to kill suspected terrorists without a Congressional declaration of war or unless an imminent attack requires an emergency response from the President

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question or under a Congressional declaration of war.

Only with permission from the country in question and only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists.

Yes, but only to gather intelligence unless there is a Congressional declaration of war towards the country intended.

I think they could fly drones for surveillance with permission from the country in question, but I don't think they should be used to kill. Maybe only as the last resort

Yes, but only with consent from the country and if the US is in immediate danger or has suffered an attack from the terrorist in question